Human Rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) has urged the
military authorities not to confirm the death sentence passed on the 12
soldiers for mutiny and other offences, rather to commute the death sentence
passed on the soldiers to imprisonment
in the interest of Justice.
The 12 soldiers are among 18 soldiers arraigned for mutiny
for firing shots at the General Officer Commanding of 7th division of Nigerian
Army, Major General Ahmed Mohammed on May 14, 2014 in Maiduguri.
The convicts
were found guilty of criminal conspiracy, mutiny, attempt to commit murder,
insubordination to a particular order and false accusation.
However, if the death sentence of the Maiduguri 12 is
confirmed by the Army Council, Falana
advised the convicted soldiers to take
the case to the Court of Appeal.
Falana remarked that the Court of Appeal is likely to follow
its decision in the case of Yussuf and 21 others versus Nigerian Army (2003) 36 WRN 68
“wherein the sentence of life imprisonment passed on the appellants who
had rioted at the Cairo Airport in Egypt
was quashed.
“It was the finding of the Court that the offense of mutiny
complained of by the respondent was instigated by the officers who had diverted the medical
allowances which ought to have been paid to the convicts while receiving
medical treatment in Egypt”, he stated.
He further argued that the facts and circumstance of
the mutinous act of the convicted soldiers should be taken into consideration.
Before the incident the soldiers at the Maimalari cantonment
had complained of insufficient ammunition, food and allowances.
The visit of the GOC was said to have coincided with the
arrival of the corpses of soldiers killed in an ambush in Chibok on the night
of May 13, 2014.
It was the tragic situation which reportedly infuriated the
soldiers.
Having investigated and confirmed the circumstances which
led to the mutiny in question the military authorities removed the GOC.
Falana pointed out that while mutiny cannot be condoned by
the armed forces because it strikes at the foundation of discipline in the
military, he emphasised that the 18
soldiers were erroneously charged under section 52(1) of the Armed Forces Act
Cap A20 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
In the circumstance, the 12 convicts should have been
charged under section 52(2) of the Armed Forces Act which provides for life
imprisonment.
He noted that the General Officer Commanding whose car was
shot at was not killed.
He said this explained why the soldiers were charged with
attempted murder which does not attract the death penalty.
The lawyer recalled that in
the case of the Akure 27, the convicted soldiers were equally charged
with mutiny but convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
He said the Army Council reduced the sentence of life
imprisonment to seven years and later
pardoned the convicts.
He recalled that the fact that the allowances of the
convicts who had served in Liberia were diverted by some military officers was
taken into cognizance by the Army Council and informed the mitigation of their
sentence.
Source: The Nation
No comments:
Post a Comment