The Washington Post has criticised
President Goodluck Jonathan over a campaign slogan in support of his
re-election in 2015.
In an editorial in the United
States-based newspaper on Tuesday, titled, ‘This may be the most inappropriate
political hostage of the year,’ it questioned the slogan’s similarity with that
of the pressure group, Bring Back Our Girls, seeking the rescue of the over 200
schoolgirls abducted in April. The article :
The #BringBackOurGirls hashtag
channeled both sympathy from abroad and local outrage and concern in Nigeria,
with many angry at the government of President Goodluck Jonathan for being
unable to free the captured women.
But four months later, the girls
have yet to be brought back despite the efforts of the Nigerian military as
well as U.S. counter-terrorism forces deployed in neighboring Chad. More than
200 girls remain missing in suspected Boko Haram captivity. Others have
perished from snakebite, illness and deprivation in the wild.
Boko Haram itself has continued its
slaughter this summer, and seized more territory in the country's restive
northeast. Over the weekend, it stormed towns along Nigeria's border with
Cameroon, killing dozens of innocents.
Nigerian forces are now fighting
Boko Haram in pitched battles around Maiduguri, the capital of Borno state, the
main hotbed of Boko Haram's operations. The U.N. reports that at least 1.5
million people have been displaced by the conflict since Jonathan's government
declared a state of emergency in May.
But the gravity of the moment hasn't
stopped some in Nigeria from appropriating the tragic hashtag for rather
cynical purposes. Banners emerged in the capital Abuja over the weekend showing
Jonathan alongside a new slogan: #BringBackGoodluck2015. The campaign appears
to be the work of supporters of the president, keen for his reelection in
presidential polls next February. It's not clear whether Jonathan has
officially endorsed the new hashtag, but its seeming ubiquity suggests that he
is not opposed to it.
*** I agree totally about the insensitivity of the campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment